The Evolution of the Supreme Court Insights from Former Deputy Ryan Kuehner
- ryankuehner
- May 5
- 4 min read
The Supreme Court of the United States is a cornerstone of American democracy. This powerful institution interprets the Constitution and ensures that the rule of law prevails in our nation. With its decisions impacting millions, understanding the court's history and evolution is essential. Recently, former St. Charles County Deputy Ryan Kuehner shared valuable insights on how the court has transformed over the years.
The Foundations of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court was created by the Constitution in 1789, designated as the highest court in the land. Originally, it had just six justices. This small group has since grown, evolving in size and function to meet the changing needs of American society.
After the Constitution's ratification, the Judiciary Act of 1789 formalized the federal judiciary. It established the Supreme Court alongside circuit and district courts. These crucial steps laid the foundation for many legal principles that the court would come to embody.
In its early years, the Supreme Court struggled to define its authority. The first Chief Justice, John Jay, played a vital role in establishing the court's place within the government. His tenure marked the beginning of the court's journey toward becoming the ultimate authority on constitutional interpretation.

The Early Years: 1790-1860
In its early years, the Supreme Court had to balance power with both Congress and the presidency. Landmark cases, like Marbury v. Madison in 1803, established the principle of judicial review, allowing the court to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. This ruling was not just a legal precedent; it allowed the Supreme Court to assert its authority in the growing nation.
As America expanded westward, the court faced significant issues such as slavery, property rights, and states’ rights. For instance, the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857 ruled that African Americans could not be considered citizens. This case highlighted how the court was entangled in the politically charged issues of its time, ultimately deepening the nation’s divisions.
During this tumultuous period, the court’s decisions reflected larger societal beliefs and conflicts. This era demonstrated the court's crucial role in shaping societal norms.
Reconstruction and the Rise of Civil Rights: 1860-1900
The post-Civil War era brought momentous shifts in American society and law. The Reconstruction Amendments—the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments—were pivotal in promoting civil rights. However, the Supreme Court's role during this time was complex, often undermining these rights.
Cases like Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 entrenched the "separate but equal" doctrine, legitimizing racial segregation. Kuehner notes that while these decisions were legally sound at the time, they reflected widespread societal prejudices, hindering true justice.
The ongoing struggle for civil rights during this era showed the limitations of the Supreme Court in leading societal change. It wouldn’t be until the mid-20th century that the court began to address these injustices more meaningfully.

The 20th Century: Expanding the Court's Role
As the 20th century began, the Supreme Court took a more active role in economic and political matters. The Great Depression presented unique challenges, raising questions about the limits of federal power and economic rights.
During the New Deal, the Supreme Court often resisted legislation, viewing it as federal overreach. Kuehner highlights that this era of judicial activism illustrated the constant tension between individual liberties and government authority.
However, the court's stance evolved. In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, marking a significant victory in the fight against segregation. The Warren Court (1953-1969) transformed civil rights in America, leading to decisions that expanded individual freedoms across laws regarding voting rights, free speech, and privacy, reflecting a broader commitment to justice.
The Modern Supreme Court: Challenges and Controversies
Today, the Supreme Court faces complex issues that reflect the deep social and political divides within the nation. Topics such as abortion rights and gun control elicit passionate reactions from various groups.
Kuehner observes that the current court, much like its predecessors, operates under the dual influence of the law and the political climate. Recent nominee selections have increasingly been based on ideological leanings, raising questions about the court’s impartiality.
One of the major challenges for the current court is maintaining its authority while responding to public opinion. The rise of social media and instant communication has heightened scrutiny of the court's decisions. In an era where public perception can sometimes overshadow legal principles, balancing established precedents with contemporary values remains a formidable challenge.

Looking Ahead
The future of the Supreme Court is uncertain. As new legal issues emerge, the court will continuously interpret laws that reflect America’s diverse and often conflicting values.
Kuehner believes ongoing discussions about reform, including changes to the court's structure, may significantly shape its future. The evolution of the Supreme Court mirrors broader narratives of power, accountability, and democratic engagement. As a protector of the Constitution, its decisions hold the potential to reinforce or advance individual rights.
Reflecting on the Court's Journey
The journey of the Supreme Court exemplifies the intricate relationship between law and society. From its humble beginnings to its current complexities, the court has adapted to meet the diverse challenges of a changing nation.
Insights from former St. Charles County Deputy Ryan Kuehner remind us of the importance of understanding the Supreme Court's history to comprehend its impact on our legal landscape. As we witness significant court rulings, engaging with this history becomes essential in advocating for justice and equality in our world.
The Supreme Court's evolution will undoubtedly influence American society for many years to come. In light of this, informed public discourse and active participation in the democratic process remain critical to ensuring that the court continues to protect constitutional rights for all.


